Connect with us

Opinion

3D Printing: A genuine challenge to IP laws and rights holders?

The prolific rate at which 3D printers are being produced is realistically projected to result in a 3D printer becoming a common household device in the next few years, writes Thapelo Montong, Senior Associate and Patent Attorney at Adams and Adams

Published

on

3D Printing

Although 3D printing technology has been in existence for several decades, its recent proliferation makes it clear that never before as much as now, has this technology presented as acute a challenge to Intellectual Property (IP) laws and rights holders, and to traditional manufacturing practices.

The prolific rate at which 3D printers are being produced is realistically projected to result in a 3D printer becoming a common household device in the next few years.

This could ultimately decentralise manufacturing, by enabling virtually anyone to become a manufacturer in the comfort of their home.

Naturally, such a result would significantly disrupt the general order of business, and do so in a far-reaching manner that would affect the economy at large, e.g. with reference to the availability of employment and the collection of taxes.

3D Printing requirements

Generally, to create a product using a 3D printer, one requires

(i) a digital file of the product to be 3D printed,

(ii) instructions that would instruct the 3D printer to additively print the product, and a material that will be used to print the product in 3D.

A 3D printer also needs to be calibrated correctly to ensure that the printed product has the desired mechanical and physical properties.

3D printing challenges met

While the second and third requirements identified above may be fairly easily met, the first requirement may be viewed as a barrier to entry, since manufacturers would argue that they may still be able to safeguard digital files containing technical drawings that may be used to 3D print their products, whether as confidential information or by relying on copyright.

ALSO READ  Technology advancement key for improved productivity in teaching, learning – DG NITDA

Such a view is blurred, however, and does not take cognisance of numerous enabling technologies that can be exploited by non-IP rights holders in creating, with minimal effort, a digital file of a product in which IP rights subsist.

One example of such a technology is a 3D scanner, which can scan a product and produce a digital file thereof in a matter of minutes.

It goes without saying that the use of such enabling technologies can not only aid non-IP rights holders to create digital files of IP protected articles for their own use, but could in fact support the establishment of an entirely new market for trading in such digital files.

While one would wish immediately to classify such a market as illegitimate with reference to the counterfeit goods market, a more thorough view would reveal that the matter is not that straightforward and that relying on conventional forms of IP and conventional IP protection strategies may well fall short in providing adequate basis for taking action against such non-IP rights holders.

Re-defined IP strategies

When looking at the broadest form of IP protection available for technological inventions, it is noteworthy that, traditionally, patents for device-related inventions would be drafted with the traditional manufacturing and assembly methods in mind.

However, with 3D printing being on the rise, it would be necessary and, in fact, essential to consider modifying this approach to cover, expressly, the new ways of manufacturing products and/or assembling components which may have been additively manufactured.

Fortunately, there are several patent claims drafting strategies that are taking shape in the world’s most prominent patent offices, that may provide useful assistance to IP rights holders.

ALSO READ  For your kids: TechQuest Rolls out Summer Camp 2018 with 3D Printers, Drones

In addition, there are other IP rights, such as designs, copyright, and trademarks, that should be considered for the purposes of preventing the dissemination of digital files of a product online, and/or the illegal manufacturing of IP protected products using 3D printers.

The South African Electronic Communications and Transactions Act could also, in some instances, be used to hold an internet service provider liable for copyright and/or patent infringement for allowing illegally obtained digital files of a product in which IP rights subsist, to be shared and sold on their platforms.

Reinvention of the wheel

As much as 3D printing appears to be the new disruptive technology on the block, there is really no need to reinvent the wheel, as existing IP laws are well-equipped to address the changes and challenges that 3D printing technology brings, provided that their implementation moves with the times.

Contact Thapelo Montong to find out more about IP strategy and laws as they apply to 3D printing.

Advertisement
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: 3D Printing: A genuine challenge to IP laws and rights holders? - 9jaheadies

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook