Armata Cyber Security – Tech | Business | Economy https://techeconomy.ng Tech | Business | Economy Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:14:47 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://techeconomy.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/cropped-256Px-32x32.png Armata Cyber Security – Tech | Business | Economy https://techeconomy.ng 32 32 Excuse Me While I Slip On Past Your Security https://techeconomy.ng/excuse-me-while-i-slip-on-past-your-security/ https://techeconomy.ng/excuse-me-while-i-slip-on-past-your-security/#respond Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:14:47 +0000 https://techeconomy.ng/?p=174398 AI-powered phishing has become the most virulent security threat to the business. Threat actors are now using advanced generative models to create highly personalised and convincing emails that are capable of bypassing traditional security measures.

Richard Frost - Cybersecurity playbook
Richard Frost, head of Technology Solutions and Consulting at Armata Cyber Security

The pervasiveness of the threat is recognised in the World Economic Forum 2025 Global Cybersecurity Outlook which found that 66% of companies expect AI and machine learning to be the root cause of vulnerabilities, and 47% said that AI was the likely driver of increasingly sophisticated attacks. Particularly with regards to social engineering.

A high percentage (25%) of respondents also, says the State of AI and Security Survey Report, believe that AI has the potential to be of more value to cybercriminals than to the business.

It makes sense. Cybercriminals would use the same technologies as companies use because they want the same benefits, and to find the same vulnerabilities.

They are weaponizing the technology, using its increasingly capable features to write natural language phishing emails, evade email filters, extract sensitive data and interact with victims in ways that appear legitimate.

Attackers are producing very clean emails that contain carefully embedded instructions designed to trigger actions by the organisation’s own AI assistants before the user ever sees the message.

For example, a malicious email could be first read by an AI assistant which will automatically interpret the contents and execute its instructions.

It doesn’t even pass by a human, the AI created email hits the AI-managed system and the attack takes place without anyone even clicking a button.

These hidden instructions are capable of requesting user lists, downloading malware or even forwarding sensitive credentials to an external party.

It’s easy to see why these attacks are difficult for companies to detect. The email itself contains no obvious indicators of compromise.

There are no dangerous attachments or suspicious links or any of the known malware signatures.

This makes it supremely easy for email security tools to then misclassify these messages as safe and pass them through the security barrier.

A human might notice inconsistencies, especially if the email body copy didn’t follow logic – like talking about an attachment that doesn’t exist, or a website without a link – but an automated system frequently misses these contextual clues.

Unfortunately, this type of phishing which combines AI-written content with behavioural insights and identity spoofing, is gaining momentum.

The Proofpoint 2025 report found that there has been a more than 1,300% increase in attacks using AI or automation. Increasingly, attackers are using combined cloned voices, business email compromise techniques and AI-generated instructions.

The challenge for the business is twofold. First, companies need to stop thinking that they are secure. Cloud platforms do not offer inherent protection. High profile outages, including DNS-related downtime, have shown that cloud environments are vulnerable.

Attackers have breached major global cloud providers and extracted large volumes of sensitive information.

It isn’t wise to assume that data hosted in platforms such as Microsoft Azure or AWS is automatically secure. Security protocols within these systems need to be bolstered by independent defence layers to ensure that the business has more than one level of protection in place.

Second, companies need to pay attention. Attackers frequently intercept ongoing email threads between companies and their customers and then insert fraudulent instructions that appear legitimate.

There have been incidents where an attacker used a compromised customer mailbox to send a fake invoice requesting the remaining balance on a transaction while contacting the supplier to request a refund of the original deposit. The company hadn’t been breached, but both the supplier and the company were financially affected.

There is a pattern to modern attacks. Cybercriminals no longer rely on single layer techniques. They’re combining AI, behavioural mimicry, identity cloning and supply chain compromise to create multi-stage fraud that passes unnoticed through traditional defences.

Fortunately, there are ways to address these risks. Implement tools that expand beyond email filtering and antivirus protection with behavioural analysis, anomaly detection and multi-layered controls to spot unusual communication patterns.

They also need to reassess the security tools they rely on. Some companies still use home user or small business solutions that perform poorly when tested against enterprise-grade benchmarks such as SE Labs or MITRE ATT&CK evaluations. Price-driven procurement can leave companies more exposed.

Finally, awareness remains a foundational defence. People cannot identify threats they do not know exist. Simple, ongoing situational awareness training that helps users recognise subtle red flags in emails, invoices and online interactions is invaluable.

Many victims fall for these scams while distracted, overloaded or rushing through daily tasks, which is exactly when attackers strike.

Cybercrime is no longer defined by obvious malicious attachments or poorly written phishing emails. It is defined by precision, automation and an ability to adapt faster than most organisations can respond.

This new generation of AI-driven attacks is not a temporary trend. It is the emerging norm and it demands the same strategic attention as any other board-level risk.

]]>
https://techeconomy.ng/excuse-me-while-i-slip-on-past-your-security/feed/ 0
Beyond Contracts and Compliance: Building Trust in Security  https://techeconomy.ng/beyond-contracts-and-compliance-building-trust-in-security/ https://techeconomy.ng/beyond-contracts-and-compliance-building-trust-in-security/#respond Thu, 23 Jan 2025 07:51:54 +0000 https://techeconomy.ng/?p=151710 Cybersecurity remains a challenging priority for the South African organisation. The CSIR State of Cybersecurity in South Africa 2024 report discovered more than one worrying number in its survey of 1200 companies – 47% had experienced an incident over the past year, 90% were targeted multiple times, 63% have cybersecurity roles that are unfilled or partially filled.

In a recent interview with Information Regulator Pansy Tlakula, she told ITWeb that the institution was receiving in excess of 150 data breach regulations every month.

And the list of well-known organisations reporting on successful attacks and breaches continues to grow with the National Health Laboratory Service, Transnet and TransUnion all on the list.

Companies are wrestling with zero-day vulnerabilities, unexpected attacks, employee errors – the CSIR found that only 32% of respondents had received training – and limited access to skilled people while simultaneously trying to do business in a complex and disruptive market.

The cost of a successful breach continues to rise and the risk of losing the business to the damages and fines is increasing exponentially. It’s becoming incredibly challenging for companies to balance their security hygiene alongside their need for growth and market share.

Organisations are increasingly partnering with managed security services providers (MSSPs) to bolster and refine their defences and better manage their visibility around security costs. However, finding the right MSSP is often as challenging as managing the security in the first place.

Many traditional security vendors operate in silos. Some focus on product deployment, others on managed services while some consultancies may restrict their involvement to an advisory capacity.

Problem is, this fragmented approach creates vulnerabilities that sophisticated threat actors are increasingly ready to exploit. You want a trusted security partner that does more than just offer you point solutions or one side of the coin. A partner that delivers end-to-end security coverage alongside scalable solutions that grow with your business.

You also need to ensure that your MSSP is agile with adaptable strategies that respond quickly to emerging threats and with highly skilled teams that have proven, deep industry expertise.

Then, added to this demanding mix, you also want a team that will communicate with you clearly and often – transparent communication is the foundation of a trusted partnership.

Another often overlooked advantage that comes with partnering is the economic benefit of economies of scale.

A MSSP has access to enterprise-grade security solutions that are traditionally only affordable for larger corporations but thanks to the as a service security model, they are now available to organisations of all sizes.

It is a democratisation of security capabilities that protects everyone throughout the security chain, not only reducing risk for all companies, but minimising the risk of a small supplier potentially infecting a large enterprise due to poor security hygiene.

This then brings the conversation back to the capabilities of your MSSP.

A solid partnership goes beyond traditional vendor relationships, providing instead customised solutions, proactive advisory, flexible engagement models and comprehensive support all wrapped within one easy to use package.

When you and your MSSP are on the same page, it is far easier to identify and address vulnerabilities before they become liabilities and to respond effectively to security incidents.

And, you get to enjoy ongoing compliance to evolving regulations because they are, well, your MSSP’s problem.

And you want your security to be someone else’s problem. Peace of mind has become, in modern business, as much a commodity as gold.

So, ensure that your chosen MSSP can provide you with comprehensive security coverage, has proven technical expertise, is agile enough to adapt to your needs, and is responsive and accessible.

Working with a trusted security partner isn’t just about technology implementation; it’s about establishing a relationship capable of evolving with your needs and the threats.

]]>
https://techeconomy.ng/beyond-contracts-and-compliance-building-trust-in-security/feed/ 0