For months, local government workers, teachers, and health officials in the six area councils of the FCT have been having issues authorities over unpaid entitlements and the suspension of a long-overdue wage increase. Now, patience has run out.

“We are waiting for it to end and we will come together to step up our planned action,” said Dr Stephen Knabayi, chairman of the FCT chapter of the NLC. “We are not happy and it is not going to be a small thing if they don’t do the needful.”

Primary schools are shut, health centres are under lock and the councils’ secretariats are empty. Despite the magnitude of the disruption, the authorities appear unmoved.

The core of the issue includes the abrupt suspension of the ₦70,000 minimum wage that was paid only once in May, the non-implementation of agreed 25% and 35% salary increases, and a ₦35,000 wage award promised to cushion economic pressures.

A seven-day ultimatum issued on June 13 by a coalition of unions under the NLC, including the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT), National Association of Health Workers, and the Nigeria Union of Local Government Employees, expired on June 20 with no action from the FCT Administration. 

Rather than act immediately, the unions decided to hold off until the president’s project ceremonies were concluded.

But that grace period is ending. Knabayi warned that, “Members of the union will take over the streets of Abuja as soon as Tinubu concludes the inaugurations.”

There’s also frustration at the area council chairmen, who labour leaders accuse of prioritising early preparations for the 2026 elections over the welfare of workers. “The funds being expended will be enough to settle all the workers’ outstanding entitlements,” Knabayi alleged.

Efforts by FCT Minister Nyesom Wike to end the crisis, including the release of ₦4.1 billion to the councils, have failed to yield results. Wike has repeatedly pointed out that primary school teachers and healthcare workers fall under the jurisdiction of the local councils, not the central FCT Administration.

Despite Wike’s intervention, the NUT insists the strike will continue. “We will not resume work until all our demands are fully met,” said NUT Chairman in the FCT, Abdullahi Shafa, during a protest in April.

On their part, council chairmen say they’re willing to negotiate. At a press conference on May 13, John Gabaya, Secretary of the FCT chapter of the Association of Local Governments of Nigeria, made a direct appeal: “We urge the primary school teachers and other council workers to call off their ongoing strike. The appeal became necessary for the interest of the pupils while negotiation continues.”

But that appeal appears to have fallen flat. With no resolution in sight and July 3 approaching, the Congress is preparing to unleash what may become the largest labour action in the capital in years.

For now, all eyes are on Abuja. Once the case of project inaugurations fades, the confrontation over unpaid wages and unfulfilled promises may well bring the city to a standstill.

Over the weekend, representatives of MTN Nigeria, Airtel and 9mobile joined by the leaders of the Association of Licensed Telecommunication Operators of Nigeria (ALTON) had a no-holds-barred session with a cross-section of media personalities, and argued strongly that the 50% tariff adjustment was necessary to save the industry from total collapse.

NCC approved 50% tariff adjustment 

Recall that the industry regulator – the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) – on January 20, 2025 announced the approval for upward review of telecom tariffs in the West African country.

The Commission led by Dr. Aminu Maida, EVC/CEO of NCC, said the approval was in pursuant to its power under Section 108 of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003 (NCA) to regulate and approve tariff rates and charges by telecommunications operators

NCC said it “will be granting approval for tariff adjustment requests by Network Operators in response to prevailing market conditions.”

The adjustment, according to a statement by Reuben Muoka, the director, Public Affairs at NCC, said the tariff increase capped at a maximum of 50% of current tariffs, though lower than the over 100 per cent requested by some network operators, was arrived at taking into account ongoing industry reforms that will positively influence sustainability.

“These adjustments will remain within the tariff bands stipulated in the 2013 NCC Cost Study, and requests will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis as is the Commission’s standard practice for tariff reviews. It will be implemented in strict adherence to the recently issued NCC Guidance on Tariff Simplification, 2024.

NLC disagrees with NCC and Telcos

However, the announcement attracted criticisms in several quarters, especially among subscribers.

Leading the opposing voices is the Nigeria Labour Congress’s (NLC). The body also plans to protest against the 50% telecom tariff increase.

NLC argued that the increase would add to the hardship faced by Nigerians, especially when they are paying more for food, electricity, petrol and others.

CHRMG tackles NLC

The NLC’s argument attracted the attention of the Coalition of Human Rights Monitoring Groups (CHRMG) which condemned the NLC’s planned protest, describing it as “misguided and not in the public interest.”

The CSOs said the tariff hike, approved by the NCC is a necessary measure to prevent the telecom sector from collapsing.

According to Dr. Gabriel Agibi, President of the group, with the current inflation rate at 34.8%, a nearly 300% increase from 8.5% in 2013 [sic: the last time telecoms tariffs were reviewed], the tariff adjustment is essential to reflect economic realities.

Agibi said the NCC’s decision was made in good faith, taking into account ongoing industry reforms that will positively influence sustainability.

He added that the tariff hike is also crucial in ensuring that Nigeria’s telecom sector remains competitive with international standards.

Tariff adjustment is necessary to save industry from collapse – ALTON

According to ALTON Chairman, Engr, Gbenga Adebayo, NCC made the vital decision to allow Telecom companies to increase their tariffs for the first time in more than 12 years.

“It was a brave decision that should be recognised and commended”.

“All the customers of our member operators are understandably disappointed that they will have to pay more to stay connected. We recognise that. We know that Nigerians have been through a series of even more substantial price increases in other sectors like fuel and power.

“That is why it is so important for us to set out why the tariffs need to go up, how the revenue from the price increases will be used and how long it is going to take us to deliver the improvements that our customers will be able to see and appreciate”.

Adebayo who argued there’s no such thing as “too big to fail” in the telecoms industry, further reminded those kicking against the price adjustments that telecom sector is capital-intensive hence it requires constant investment to maintain the infrastructure that operators use to deliver connectivity, “ensuring that we can deliver the quality of service that our customers demand and continue to upgrade to the latest technologies like 5G”.

…a step to get Telecom Sector out of the ‘sickbed’ – Okigbo

Speaking during the session over the weekend, Tobe Okigbo, chief corporate services and sustainability Officer, MTN Nigeria, said:

“We are not talking about profitability right now; we will get there eventually. Our first priority is to get out of this sickbed. We are talking about survival because this industry is central to national development in the digital age. Imagine how backward we would become as a nation if the telecoms industry were to collapse.

“What are the alternatives? Telecoms services are critical to the growth and sustainability of key sectors like banking, healthcare, education, entertainment, and commerce. Is there any industry that doesn’t rely on telecoms services?

“Some of us are advocating for the sustainability of this industry not just because we work in the sector, but also because we have witnessed its evolution and growth. Now, we are seeing a decline; even before reaching our peak!

“Every sector that has collapsed or declined in Nigeria did not get to that point overnight; it happened gradually. We must not let the telco industry collapse.

“Let’s all do our part to keep this vital industry alive. With the right pricing, telcos will be able to ramp up investment that will enable them to provide even better quality services. We expect customers and regulators to hold us accountable. We all have a stake in the telecoms industry.

“It’s our industry. Yes ‘our’ because it belongs to all of us. Let’s not watch it die because we want to pay less, which will eventually suffocate the industry till it will no longer be able to breathe”, he said.

Nodding in agreement, Femi Adeniran, the director, Corporate Communications& CSR at Airtel Nigeria, re-emphasized the need to protect the ‘ostrich that lays golden eggs.

According to him, telecommunications industry provides infrastructure for other sectors hence the services are not just about phone calls or browsing the internet; “it powers vital sectors like education, healthcare, banking, and public safety, and deserves to breathe too”.

He said the industry is even committed to play greater roles towards deepening Nigeria’s digital economy as a critical pillar of the country’s national development strategy.

…a step towards long-term sustainability

Kenechukwu Okonkwo, the director of Product Innovation & Business Development at 9mobile, also commended the applauded the Federal Government for approving a 50% tariff adjustment, which he described as a vital initiative aimed at addressing persistent challenges in Nigeria’s telecom sector.

“This decision, reached after extensive deliberations, marks a significant step towards ensuring the long-term sustainability of the industry by enabling the necessary investments to enhance service quality (QoS) for consumers nationwide”, he said, and pledged 9mobile’s commitment to offer even improved services to the customers.

Techeconomy gathered that telcos may start adjusting their tariffs (upward) in the coming weeks.

Meanwhile, representatives of Globacom, one of the ‘big four’, where conspicuously absent at the session on Saturday.

NLC, on Wednesday, declared it would embark on protest on February 4 against the announcement by the Nigerian Communications Commission allowing telecommunications network providers to adjust their rates by 50 per cent.

In a communiqué signed by Joe Ajaero, the national president of NLC, the decision was taken at the National Administrative Council meeting on January 29.

Similarly, Civil Society Organisations have pledged their support for the nationwide protest.

Failure to reverse the hike, Ajaero warned, might result in a nationwide boycott of telecommunication services.

Endorsing the rally, the Civil Society Legislative and Advocacy Centre, National Civil Society Council of Nigeria and the Take It Back Movement condemned the tariff hike and assured that they would participate in the protests.

The Federal Government had approved a 50 per cent increase though the telecom operators requested a 100 per cent increase.

In response to the development, the NLC rejected the hike describing it as insensitive, unjustifiable, and a direct assault on Nigerian workers and the general populace already burdened by the worsening economic hardship.

Ajaero said,

“After extensive discussions, the following resolutions were reached: NAC-in-session totally rejected the 50 per cent telecom tariff hike which it considers as too harsh for citizens. It therefore strongly condemns the Nigeria Communications Commission’s decision to approve the increase in telecommunications tariffs.

“This decision is insensitive, unjustifiable, and a direct assault on Nigerian workers and the general populace, who are already burdened by worsening economic hardship foisted on them by the policies of the government which was no fault of theirs.”

He noted that the union would embark on a nationwide protest on February 4 to warn against the decision of the government.

Ajaero said,

“To express our collective opposition to this arbitrary tariff hike, the NLC will embark on a nationwide mass rally on Tuesday, February 4, 2025.

‘’The rally will serve as a warning on the dangers of imposing such an unfair increase on a struggling population earning a minimum wage of only N70,000; a population that has suffered outrageous hikes in the price of petrol, high cost of food, hike in electricity tariff and general rising inflation.”

Ajaero directed all NLC affiliates to mobilise their members for the rally.

He said,

“All NLC affiliates and state councils are directed to begin full mobilization in preparation for the February 4, 2025, nationwide protest rally. Willing civil society allies are also encouraged to join the preparation.

“The congress calls on all Nigerian workers, the informal sector, and the general public to stand in solidarity against this unjust policy.”

He demanded an immediate suspension of the 50 per cent tariff hike, calling on the Federal Government to dialogue with stakeholders.

The labour leader warned that failure to do this might result in a nationwide boycott of telecommunication services.

He stated,

“NAC-in-session demands an immediate suspension of the 50 per cent tariff hike. It calls on the Federal Government, the Nigeria Communication Commission and the National Assembly to engage in meaningful dialogue with critical stakeholders to review the proposed tariff adjustment within the context of the economic realities facing Nigerians.

“Should these not be heeded, the Nigeria Labour Congress will escalate its actions, including the possibility of a nationwide boycott of telecommunication services and further mass actions which may involve nationwide withdrawal of our service to resist policies that exacerbate poverty and inequality.

“The Nigeria Labour Congress remains committed to protecting the interests of Nigerian workers and citizens against exploitative economic policies. We will not relent in our struggle against policies that undermine the welfare and dignity of our people.

‘’Nigerian workers and citizens must unite and take action to prevent further economic oppression. We must resist any policy that prioritizes corporate profits over the well-being of the people.”

Commenting on the planned protest, Auwal Musa Rafsanjani, the executive director of CISLAC, said the organisation will always side with the people and “support any action to bring down these prices and reduce the hardship Nigerians are facing.”

He added,

“CISLAC will always side with the people, will always support the Nigerian people, as against the multinational corporations that are extorting Nigerians, and their collaborators within the government.

‘’We will always uphold efforts at ensuring that the welfare of Nigerians and the living conditions of Nigerians improve. Whatever the position the NLC has taken, CISLAC will support any action that is going to help the masses and is going to bring down the prices for Nigerians that are suffering.’’

According to Punch report, Damilare Adenola, the director of Mobilisation for the Take It Back Movement, mentioned that the group would participate in the nationwide protests.

“I can say that we instigated the NLC to take action. So, for us to have done that implies that we are part and parcel of the action. We stand for the reversal of the tariff hike, unequivocally. We are not asking for a reduction,” Adenola stated.

Blessing Akinlosotu, the executive director of the NCSCN,  said the declaration of the nationwide protest by organised labour showed that Nigerians were unhappy with the tariff hike.

He added that the council would picket the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Council office.

“We have submitted a letter officially to the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Council office, and we let them understand that from the Civil Society Council that we lead, over 20 different organisations have written to the council to express displeasure over the frivolous and high increment without proper consultation.

“We wrote them officially today, and in the letter, it was there that we will start a protest on Monday. So, I was not even aware of the NLC calling for a protest. But we have notified them officially of picketing their office on Monday morning.

“The economy is not friendly to the poor masses, fuel has been increased, electricity tariff has been increased, which is extremely high on Nigerians. And now, to reach out to loved ones will be extremely difficult. That is the height of suffocation,’’ he complained.

However, the telecommunications companies and subscribers have strongly opposed the NLC over for its planned protest.

Earlier, Engineer Gbenga Adebayo, chairman of the Association of Licensed Telecommunication Companies of Nigeria (ALTON), said that the telecoms tariff hike is justified as “prices of everything have gone up. We are in the same economic situation. We all face the same economic headwinds. We all procure things from the same market.

“And ours have become a lot more difficult because we provide services across the country. Logistics alone is a major problem. We must deliver services 24/7; there are challenges of access, security, high cost of transportation, and all of the external factors that we confront including inflation, forex and more. And this is the first time telecoms tariff will be adjusted in the last 12 years. No other sector has endured like the telecoms.”

As the country grapples with economic challenges, regional disparities, and the need for social justice, finding a balance between fair compensation for workers and economic sustainability has become a pressing concern.

This discussion has raised questions about the impact of increasing the minimum wage, the role of government in supporting workers, and the need for accountability and transparency in policymaking.

In this context, both workers and the government need to explore innovative solutions and collaborative approaches to address these challenges and promote economic development for all citizens.

• The debate around the appropriate minimum wage for Nigeria’s workers is a complex and contentious issue that has been ongoing for many years.

On one hand, some argue that a higher minimum wage is necessary to provide workers with a decent standard of living and to reduce poverty.

They argue that a higher minimum wage will stimulate consumer spending, boost demand for goods and services, and ultimately strengthen economic development.

On the other hand, some argue that a higher minimum wage could have negative effects on businesses, leading to job losses, reduced hours, and increased prices for consumers.

They argue that a higher minimum wage could also lead to increased inflation, which could further harm the economy.

In the context of democracy, a higher minimum wage is seen as a way to promote social justice and reduce income inequality, which are important pillars of a democratic society.

By ensuring that workers are paid a fair wage for their work, a higher minimum wage can help to ensure that all citizens have the opportunity to participate fully in the economic and social life of the country.

Ultimately, the appropriate minimum wage for Nigeria’s workers is a balancing act between the need to provide workers with a decent standard of living and the need to ensure that businesses can remain competitive and create jobs.

It is important that all stakeholders, including government, employers, and workers, come together to find a solution that works for everyone and promotes economic development and democracy.

Let’s excavate! As Nigeria grapples with the pressing issue of determining an appropriate minimum wage, whether it be N60,000, N62,000, or a higher amount, it is vital to consider the implications for both workers and the government.

The imperative for striking a balance between economic viability and social equity has sparked intense debate and scrutiny. In this context, it is crucial to delve into the underlying factors and potential solutions that can ensure a fair and sustainable wage structure for all stakeholders involved.

It is difficult to determine a specific amount that would be appropriate as the minimum wage for Nigeria’s workers, as it depends on various factors such as the cost of living, productivity levels, and economic conditions.
However, considering the current economic situation in Nigeria, a minimum wage of N60,000 or N62,000 could be considered appropriate for several reasons.

Firstly, the current minimum wage in Nigeria is N30,000, which is one of the lowest in Africa. Increasing the minimum wage to N60,000 or N62,000 would help to address the issue of low wages and provide workers with a more decent standard of living. This would also help to reduce poverty and inequality, which are key challenges facing the country.

Secondly, a higher minimum wage would stimulate consumer spending, as workers would have more disposable income to spend on goods and services. This would in turn boost demand for products, leading to increased production and economic growth.

Additionally, a higher minimum wage would contribute to social justice and promote democracy by ensuring that workers are fairly compensated for their work.

This would help to enhance the overall well-being of workers, improve their quality of life, and empower them to participate more fully in the economic and social life of the country.

However, it is important to consider the potential impact of a higher minimum wage on businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises.

Adequate measures should be put in place to support businesses in adjusting to the increase in labour costs, such as providing tax incentives or subsidies.

Surmising, while a minimum wage of N60,000 or N62,000 could be considered appropriate at this time to improve the standard of living for Nigerian workers, further analysis and stakeholder consultations are necessary to determine the most suitable and sustainable minimum wage level for the country.

• However, the prospect of raising the minimum wage to N90,000, N100,000, or even higher figures brings to the fore a crucial question: are there any inherent risks or dangers in such a significant increase?

While a higher minimum wage may appear to be a solution to addressing income inequality and improving living standards, the potential consequences must be carefully considered. The potential impact on inflation, job creation, and overall economic stability cannot be overlooked.

Furthermore, the sustainability of such a substantial increase and its long-term effects on the economy requires thorough analysis and foresight.

It is essential to weigh the benefits against the potential drawbacks of a drastic wage hike to ensure a balanced and realistic approach to wage policy in Nigeria.

Functionally, while increasing the minimum wage to N90,000, N100,000, or even higher may seem beneficial in terms of providing workers with higher incomes, some potential dangers and challenges need to be considered. Some of these potential risks include:

1. Inflation: A sudden and significant increase in the minimum wage could lead to inflationary pressures, as businesses may pass on the higher labour costs to consumers through price hikes. This could erode the purchasing power of consumers and negate the intended benefits of the wage increase.

2. Unemployment: Higher minimum wages could lead to job losses, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises that may struggle to absorb the increased labour costs. This could result in higher unemployment rates, particularly among low-skilled workers who are most likely to be affected by minimum wage increases.

3. Informal Economy: A drastic increase in the minimum wage could incentivize more businesses to operate in the informal economy to avoid complying with labour regulations. This could undermine efforts to formalize the economy and ensure decent working conditions for all workers.

4. Business Viability: Small businesses, in particular, may struggle to remain viable if they are forced to pay significantly higher minimum wages. This could lead to closures, reduced investment, and a slowdown in economic growth.

5. Regional Disparities: A uniform minimum wage increase across the country may not take into account regional differences in economic conditions and cost of living. It could exacerbate disparities between regions and hinder economic development in less affluent areas.

While increasing the minimum wage is important for improving workers’ living standards and promoting economic development, it is essential to strike a balance that considers the needs of both workers and businesses.

Incremental and phased increases, accompanied by measures to support businesses and address potential negative impamaybeay be a more sustainable approach to raising the minimum wage.

Stakeholder consultations and impact assessments should be conducted to ensure that any wage increase is implemented effectively and benefits all stakeholders in the economy.

The question then arises: Are there any analytical recommendations in light of issues, thought processes, and solutions to this prevailing matter for both the workers and government of Nigeria?

This must entail all political appointees also cutting down on their excessive and above-the-board living style so that they allow their citizens to experience economic prosperity and enjoy the dividends of democracy at this time.

Certainly! In light of the challenges surrounding the appropriate minimum wage for Nigeria’s workers, as well as the need for economic development and democratic dividends, the following recommendations and solutions could be considered by both workers and the government:

1. Phased and Incremental Increases: Instead of a sudden and drastic increase in the minimum wage, a phased and incremental approach could be adopted. This would allow businesses to adjust gradually to higher labor costs and mitigate the risks of inflation and job losses.

2. Regional Wage Disparities: Consideration should be given to regional differences in economic conditions and cost of living when setting minimum wage levels. This could help address disparities between regions and ensure that workers are adequately compensated based on local conditions.

3. Support for Small Businesses: The government could provide support and incentives for small and medium-sized enterprises to help them cope with higher labor costs. This could include tax breaks, access to credit, and skills training programs to improve productivity and competitiveness.

4. Social Safety Nets: To protect vulnerable workers and mitigate the impact of job losses, social safety nets such as unemployment benefits and job training programs could be expanded. This would help workers transition to new employment opportunities and support those most affected by minimum wage increases.

5. Transparency and Accountability: Both workers and the government should advocate for transparency and accountability in the implementation of minimum wage policies. This includes ensuring that minimum wage laws are enforced, monitoring compliance by businesses, and holding policymakers accountable for their decisions.

6. Tackle Corruption and Excessive Spending: Addressing corruption and reducing excessive spending by political appointees could free up resources that could be redirected towards supporting workers and promoting economic development. This would require political will, institutional reforms, and effective anti-corruption measures.

7. Dialogue and Collaboration: Workers, government officials, employers, and other stakeholders should engage in constructive dialogue and collaboration to find common solutions to the challenges surrounding the minimum wage. This could involve labor unions, business associations, civil society organizations, and policymakers working together to address concerns and find sustainable solutions.

By taking a holistic and collaborative approach, both workers and the government of Nigeria can work towards achieving a fair and sustainable minimum wage that promotes economic development, social justice, and democratic dividends for all citizens.

Therefore, the discussions and analysis presented in this piece highlight the multifaceted nature of the minimum wage debate in Nigeria.

As workers and the government navigate complex economic and social issues, it is crucial to consider the impact of minimum wage increases on businesses, regional disparities, and vulnerable populations.

By adopting a phased and collaborative approach, implementing social safety nets, and promoting transparency and accountability, stakeholders can work towards a fair and sustainable minimum wage system that benefits workers and the economy as a whole.

Through dialogue, engagement, and shared responsibility, Nigeria can move closer to realizing the democratic dividends and economic opportunities that its citizens deserve.

=====

The Writer, Prof. Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is the first Nigerian Professor of Cyber Security and Information Technology Management, and the first Professor of African descent to be awarded a Chartered Manager Status.

Nigeria lost N148.8 billion in oil revenue due to the organized labour’s industrial action protesting the N60,000 minimum wage proposal by the FG against they N494,000 demanded.

Again, the two-day nationwide strike led to an estimated N7 billion loss for the country, affecting domestic cargo agents and halting airline operations.

The shutdown of the national grid, as reported, occurred on June 3, 2024, at about 2:19 a.m., leading to a nationwide blackout. This action alone resulted in huge economic losses due to halted operations across multiple industries.

Many people were likely glued to their news feeds this week, worried about the strike. Imagine waking up Monday morning to a nation on hold.

Schools closed, businesses shuttered, hospitals and airports facing standstills – that was the reality Nigerians faced this week with the strike by the NLC and TUC.

However, labour suspended the strike to enable more negotiations with the government at the center.

As the negotiations as still ongoing, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, said that is in agreement that a new minimum wage is due.

However, the Forum urges all parties to consider the fact that the minimum wage negotiations also involve consequential adjustments across all cadres, including pensioners.

The NGF led by AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, the governor of Kwara State, as chairman, “cautions parties in this important discussion to look beyond just signing a document for the sake of it; any agreement to be signed should be sustainable and realistic.

“All things considered, the NGF holds that the N60,000 minimum wage proposal is not sustainable and cannot fly.

“It will simply mean that many states will spend all their FAAC allocations on just paying salaries with nothing left for development purposes. In fact, a few states will end up borrowing to pay workers every month. We do not think this will be in the collective interest of the country, including workers.

“We appeal that all parties involved, especially the labour unions, consider all the socioeconomic variables and settle for an agreement that is sustainable, durable, and fair to all other segments of the society who have legitimate claim to public resources”.

However, the decision to resort to a strike as a means of achieving these goals raises concerns about the potential repercussions on critical infrastructure and essential services in the country.

In light of the ongoing global economic and technological challenges, including the issues around a global pandemic age, where the stability and security of healthcare, telecommunications, and banking services are more important than ever, it is crucial to explore alternative solutions that address the concerns of workers while safeguarding the well-being of the nation.

As a cybersecurity expert and chartered manager, I stress the critical need to maintain cybersecurity during times of potential unrest like a national strike.

The digital landscape is integral to our daily lives and disruptions can leave systems vulnerable to cyber attacks.

Cybercriminals exploit the chaos to cause harm, leading to data breaches, financial losses, and service disruptions. It is essential to protect digital assets and infrastructure, especially in times of tension. I urge the Nigeria National Labour Congress to seek alternative solutions that do not compromise national cybersecurity.

Collaboration and dialogue can lead to sustainable resolutions that benefit all. Let us prioritize digital security while advocating for fair working conditions.

As a leading expert in cybersecurity and information technology and a foremost professor in the field, it is vital to acknowledge the importance of safeguarding critical sectors like infrastructure, healthcare, and finance in today’s digital era.

These sectors are highly interconnected and dependent on digital systems, making them prime targets for cyber attacks.

A national strike could create opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities in these sectors, potentially leading to widespread disruptions, financial losses, and the exposure of sensitive data of Nigerian citizens.

The impact of a successful cyber attack on sectors like healthcare could be life-threatening, affecting patient care and public health.

Similarly, an attack on financial institutions could cause economic instability and erode trust in the banking system. Furthermore, an attack on infrastructure could disrupt essential services such as power and transportation.

It is crucial for the Nigeria National Labour Congress to carefully consider the potential consequences of a strike on cybersecurity.

Protecting digital infrastructure and ensuring the safety of personal data should be a top priority during times of unrest. I urge the Nigeria National Labour Congress to engage in constructive dialogue and explore alternative solutions that address their concerns without compromising the cybersecurity of critical sectors. Collaboration and a focus on cybersecurity can help create a safer and more resilient digital environment that benefits all Nigerian citizens.

Furthermore, a national strike could disrupt essential services such as healthcare, telecommunications, and banking, magnifying the challenges faced by the country as a result of the ongoing global pandemic.

In the healthcare sector, interruptions in services could impede patient care, access to medical treatment, and distribution of essential supplies, all of which are crucial during a health crisis.

This disruption could not only impact those seeking medical assistance but also contribute to increased strain on healthcare workers and facilities already overwhelmed by the demands of the pandemic.

Additionally, disruptions in telecommunications services could hinder communication among healthcare professionals, emergency responders, and the general public, affecting the coordination of pandemic response efforts and potentially slowing down the dissemination of vital information to those in need.

Furthermore, a disruption in banking services could hinder financial transactions, access to funds, and economic activities at a time when stability and financial support are critical for individuals, businesses, and the overall economy to weather the challenges posed by the pandemic.

This could exacerbate financial hardships, disrupt supply chains, and impede the flow of essential goods and services, further deepening the economic impact of the crisis on the country.

The combined effects of disruptions in these essential services due to a national strike could have far-reaching consequences on public health, emergency response, economic stability, and overall social well-being, underscoring the importance of safeguarding critical sectors and maintaining operational resilience during these challenging times.

While I sympathize with the Labour Congress and their legitimate concerns regarding wages and working conditions for workers, I firmly believe that there are alternative, more effective methods to address these issues without resorting to a strike.

Engaging in open dialogue, negotiation, and collaboration with employers, government officials, and other stakeholders can lead to sustainable solutions that benefit both workers and employers.

By exploring innovative approaches such as mediation, arbitration, or collective bargaining, it is possible to address grievances constructively and achieve meaningful change without disrupting essential services or compromising national security.

Moreover, investing in ongoing communication, transparency, and trust-building between all parties involved can foster a productive working environment where concerns are heard, grievances are addressed, and solutions are implemented fairly and equitably.

This approach not only promotes a more harmonious relationship between labour and management but also supports the long-term well-being and prosperity of workers, businesses, and the economy as a whole.

By prioritizing peaceful and productive methods of conflict resolution, we can cultivate a culture of mutual respect, understanding, and cooperation that enhances workplace conditions, promotes social justice, and fosters sustainable economic growth.

We must explore all avenues for dialogue and compromise before resorting to actions that may have unintended consequences and jeopardize the welfare of all stakeholders involved.

I strongly encourage the Nigeria National Labour Congress to proactively initiate and foster constructive dialogue not only with the government but also with all relevant stakeholders, including employers, industry representatives, and cybersecurity experts.

By engaging in open, transparent, and collaborative discussions, all parties can work together to find a mutually beneficial solution that addresses the legitimate concerns of workers while safeguarding the security and stability of the country’s critical infrastructure.

Creating a forum for dialogue that promotes active listening, empathy, and respect for differing perspectives is crucial in building consensus and finding common ground. Through this process, potential compromises, innovative solutions, and win-win outcomes can be explored to ensure that the interests of all stakeholders are considered and protected.

Moreover, involving cybersecurity experts and professionals in the dialogue can provide valuable insights into the potential risks and implications of a strike on critical infrastructure, helping to inform decision-making and prioritize cybersecurity concerns.

By leveraging their expertise and guidance, the Labour Congress can make informed choices that mitigate risks, strengthen resilience, and safeguard the digital infrastructure that underpins essential services and operations.

Ultimately, by committing to meaningful engagement, collaboration, and problem-solving, the Labour Congress can demonstrate leadership, responsibility, and a genuine commitment to advancing the well-being and interests of workers while upholding the security and stability of the nation.

It is through proactive dialogue and cooperation that lasting, sustainable solutions can be achieved, benefiting workers, businesses, the economy, and society as a whole.

With extensive focus and professionalism, I am acutely aware of the potential risks and vulnerabilities that a national strike could pose.

I implore the Labour Congress to prioritize the well-being and safety of Nigerian citizens and reconsider their decision to go on strike at this time.

In conclusion, while the grievances of the Nigeria National Labour Congress are valid and deserving of attention, the potential consequences of a strike on essential services and critical infrastructure cannot be underestimated.

By prioritizing constructive dialogue, collaboration, and stakeholder engagement, the Labour Congress can demonstrate its commitment to advancing the interests of workers while ensuring the security and stability of the country.

Through proactive efforts to find mutually beneficial solutions and address cybersecurity concerns, all parties can work together towards a sustainable and inclusive resolution that promotes the well-being of workers, businesses, and the nation as a whole.

=======

The Writer, Prof. Ojo Emmanuel Ademola is the first Nigerian Professor of Cyber Security and Information Technology Management, and the first Professor of African descent to be awarded a Chartered Manager Status.

Festus Osifo, the TUC president, said this on Tuesday in Abuja after a joint extraordinary national executive council meeting of the unions. A communique will be issued shortly, the labour chief said.

Both unions downed tools on Monday to register their grievances over the hike in electricity tariff and lack of consensus on a new minimum wage.

The development ground activities in critical sectors of the economy with schools, businesses, hospitals, and airports shut.

The national grid was also shut down, throwing the nation into darkness.

Dr Vincent Olatunji, the national commissioner/CEO of NDPC, represented NDPC, Mr Lanre Gbajabiamila, director general, NLRC, represented NLRC, and Mr c, director general of SMEDAN, represented SMEDAN during the signing of the MOU at the Headquarters of SMEDAN and NLRC respectively.

The partnership with SMEDAN seeks to promote data protection within the Small and Medium Enterprise ecosystem, with approximately 40 million SMEs.

The MoU establishes a framework for collaboration, including the formation of a working group to focus on capacity building in data protection.

This initiative aims to educate SMEs on adopting appropriate technical and organizational measures towards safeguarding data privacy.

Dr Olatunji who expressed optimism about the implementation of the memoranda with the two strategic agencies assured stakeholders that the trusted use of data will guarantee short, medium and long term growth.

 “You have almost 40 million players within this sector alone, imagine the exponential growth we can bring in if people can carry out transactions on the basis of trust and confidence. It is good that we are here today, to put pen into paper, we have to work together to ensure that there is privacy in what you are doing in the sector.”

The MoU between the NLRC bolsters the collaboration between the two Commissions. The DG, NLRC, Mr Lanre Gbajabiamila, expressed gratitude for NDPC’s ongoing support and also underscored the importance of safeguarding personal data within the gaming ecosystem.

The MoU formalises the commitment to uphold data protection laws and implement best practices in data storage and processing.

Dr Olatunji reiterated the significance of this partnership, emphasising the need to protect the personal data of approximately 60 million data subjects within the gaming sector.

He stressed the importance of training NLRC staff and stakeholders on data protection principles to foster a culture of compliance.

He said,

“We are looking at an ecosystem with about 60 million people who regularly exchange and process data, this is one sector that cannot be overlooked. SMEDAN has 40 million Nigerians monitored under them, we have almost half of the population.”

“When we talk about the interests and freedom of all Nigerians, we have to ensure that the personal data of over 220 million people are adequately protected and processed in line with extant regulatory framework, ” he added.

Mr Lanre Gbajabiamila, the director general, NLRC, expressed appreciation to the NDPC for their ongoing work.

“The change that the establishment of NDPC has brought to the gaming value chain is commendable, we are not taking this MoU for granted. International partners come here to see what we do and make comments that are welcoming to show that we are on the right part which is acceptable to the industry for operations to come in.

“We would also like to collaborate with you in conducting joint awareness campaigns and capacity building on data governance.

Mr Charles Odii, the DG, SMEDAN, expressed appreciation for NDPC’s readiness to collaborate. He emphasised the significance of data protection and complying with the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023, in preparing for international business.

He said, “SMEDAN is out to prevent exposure of our data for selfish and malicious operations.  We have to show that the data we are mining in Nigeria is protected according to our data protection law.”

“We cannot be a development agency if we are not teaching small businesses the right thing to do. In developing small businesses, we need to upskill and sensitise them. We will go into the nooks and crannies of Nigeria to make them understand that if you process data then you must abide by the data protection laws in Nigeria,” he added.

These collaborations mark significant milestones in NDPC’s mission to promote data protection and privacy across diverse sectors in Nigeria. The commission remains committed to fostering partnerships that uphold the rights of individuals and ensure the responsible handling of personal data.

In a statement released by NLC President Joe Ajaero, the organization vehemently rejected the new pump price, deeming it provocative.

Ajaero criticized the fuel price increase, stating that it was intended to exacerbate poverty levels and intensify the hardships already faced by Nigerians.

The NLC expressed deep concern over the 18% surge in fuel prices, particularly during a period of significant difficulties for the Nigerian people.

Describing the hike as “sadistic and unacceptable,” Ajaero emphasized that it displayed insensitivity and a sense of triumphalism by the government against the suffering masses.

The NLC warned that such actions could push Nigerians to the brink and potentially override any mechanisms the government claims to have put in place as safeguards.

Bensoah, the NLC’s head of information and public affairs, further stressed that the adjustment in fuel prices was unacceptable to Nigerians. He emphasized that the increase jeopardizes socio-economic security, businesses, earnings, and overall quality of life for the populace.

Furthermore, the labor movement alleged that the Federal Government is contemplating raising fuel prices as high as N1,000 per litre.

The union questioned the benefits of such projected price hikes for both the people and the economy, particularly considering the ongoing discussions surrounding economic recovery.

NLC Warns Federal Government Against Provocative Fuel Price HikeThe NLC’s strong stance against the fuel price increase highlights growing concerns and frustrations within the Nigerian populace.

As Nigerians grapple with the persistent challenges of rising fuel costs and economic hardships, the NLC’s resistance serves as a call for the government to address the pressing issues and prioritize the well-being of its citizens

Both labor unions argue that the offered amount is grossly inadequate to alleviate the hardships faced by workers due to the elimination of subsidies.

In an interview with reporters in Abuja, Hakeem Ambali, the National Treasurer of the NLC, raised concerns about the limited coverage of palliative.

He questioned the extent to which this sum could alleviate the economic hardships faced by over 125 million Nigerians living in poverty.

Ambali suggested various measures that could effectively mitigate the impact of subsidy removal.

These include a substantial minimum wage increase of 300% for all workers, granting licenses for modular refineries to enable local petrol refining, providing economic stimulus loans to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) at a 15% interest rate, and implementing social benefits for the elderly and unemployed youths.

Furthermore, he proposed initiatives such as agricultural loans at favorable rates from institutions like the Agricultural Bank and community banks, investment in alternative energy sources like solar power and Compressed Natural Gas, refinery repairs, reversing the privatization of electricity due to poor performance, executing metro rail line projects across state capitals, and reducing tertiary institution school fees.

The rejection of the N500 billion palliative by the labor unions highlights their concerns regarding the severity of the economic impact of fuel subsidy removal and the inadequacy of the proposed measures to address it.

The unions argue for a more comprehensive approach that encompasses substantial wage increases, localized refining capacity, support for SMEs, and investments in alternative energy sources.

President Tinubu’s request to amend the 2022 supplementary appropriation Act reflects the government’s acknowledgment of the need to address the challenges arising from subsidy removal.

However, it remains to be seen how the government will respond to the labor unions’ calls for broader measures that address the root causes of economic hardships and provide sustainable solutions.

As the discussions continue, the government needs to engage in constructive dialogue with the labor unions and consider comprehensive measures that address the concerns of all stakeholders involved.

Balancing the needs of the Nigerian people, the economy, and the long-term goals of sustainable development will be crucial in navigating this complex issue