The call, which began at 8 a.m. Washington time, was the first direct exchange between the two leaders in three months.

Earlier this year, Washington threatened to shut TikTok down unless its U.S. operations are transferred from Chinese parent company ByteDance to American ownership. 

Congress set a deadline of January 2025, though Trump has so far avoided enforcing it. He has admitted that banning the app outright could trigger a backlash among its millions of American users.

“I like TikTok; it helped get me elected,” Trump said on Thursday. “TikTok has tremendous value. The United States has that value in its hand because we’re the ones that have to approve it.”

Beijing, however, must sign off on any deal before it moves forward. Sources familiar with the talks say U.S. investors would take over TikTok’s American assets, but ByteDance would continue supplying the algorithm that drives the app’s powerful content recommendations. This unsettles U.S. lawmakers who argue that algorithmic control is inseparable from political influence.

“The platform may be American-owned, but if the algorithm is Chinese, the risk remains,” warned Senator Mark Warner, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Trade and technology disputes

The TikTok talks are unfolding against a bigger economic fight. Since returning to office, Trump has raised tariffs on Chinese goods, some to levels not seen in nearly a century. Beijing retaliated with its own restrictions, leaving both economies struggling. 

The U.S. is battling high inflation and a record trade deficit with China, while China’s growth slowed to 4.2% in the second quarter of 2025, its weakest pace since the pandemic.

Despite these pressures, Trump insists he is close to securing better terms with Beijing. “We’re pretty close to a deal,” he said on Thursday, hinting at an extension of current trade terms. Washington is pressing China to buy more U.S. soybeans and Boeing aircraft, while also demanding a crackdown on fentanyl-related chemical exports—an issue the U.S. blames for soaring overdose deaths.

TikTok as leverage

Analysts say Beijing is using TikTok as a bargaining chip while holding back exports of rare-earth materials vital for U.S. technology production. “China’s effective use of sticks (rare earths) and carrots (TikTok) has turned things heavily in their favour,” said Scott Kennedy of the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Washington, in turn, has restricted China’s access to advanced semiconductor designs, jet engines and specialised chemicals.

Political stakes

For Trump, TikTok represents more than a trade issue. It is also a political tool. Banning the platform risks alienating young voters who use it daily. Allowing it to continue under a restructured deal, however, lets him claim a win on national security without losing a vital channel of communication.

Diplomats are already eyeing a possible face-to-face meeting between Trump and Xi at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in South Korea next month. Such a meeting could test whether personal diplomacy can ease one of the most fractious U.S.–China relationships in decades.

Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington, said: “Heads-of-state diplomacy plays an irreplaceable role in providing strategic guidance for China-U.S. relations.”

As a sign of goodwill, Beijing recently allowed Wells Fargo banker Chenyue Mao to leave China after months of travel restrictions. Yet even with gestures like this, the unresolved issues—Taiwan, the South China Sea, and competing economic interests—make it obvious that a single phone call will not erase the deep mistrust between Washington and Beijing.

The accusation, which was posted Thursday on Trump’s social media platform, has left the tech and political sectors in shock, increasing evaluation on one of America’s most strategically important chipmakers.

“The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!” Trump posted on Truth Social.

Trump offered no specific evidence to back his claim, but his statements come in the wake of some Republican issues on the company. 

On Wednesday, Senator Tom Cotton had written to Intel’s board demanding clarity on Tan’s personal and professional ties to Chinese entities. 

Cotton’s letter raised red flags about Tan’s leadership at Cadence Design Systems—where tools were reportedly sold to a Chinese military-linked university—and his subsequent investments in Chinese tech firms through his venture capital arm, Walden International.

A Reuters report detailed that Tan had channeled over $200 million into various Chinese companies, with several reportedly linked to the country’s military or national security infrastructure. Cotton has questioned whether such entanglements are compatible with Intel’s receipt of federal funds under the CHIPS and Science Act.

“The new CEO of @intel reportedly has deep ties to the Chinese Communists. U.S. companies who receive government grants should be responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars and adhere to strict security regulations. The board of @Intel owes Congress an explanation,” Cotton posted on X, attaching his formal letter.

Tan, who assumed the role of CEO in March 2025, has been steering Intel through a major overhaul in the face of stiff competition from Nvidia, AMD, and TSMC. 

His tenure has so far involved aggressive cost-cutting: thousands of job losses, cancelled factory expansions, and efforts to offload non-core business units. His stated aim is to restore Intel’s reputation as a leader in chip engineering, a position it has steadily lost over the last decade.

But these leadership decisions now risk being overshadowed by the political fallout. Intel’s strategic importance to U.S. national security is significant. It is the single largest beneficiary under the CHIPS Act, with $8.5 billion earmarked for new manufacturing facilities across Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio, and Oregon. 

The controversy around Tan’s alleged links to China could compromise the company’s ability to maintain bipartisan confidence and secure future federal support.

Intel has not yet responded to multiple requests for comment on the matter. Tan himself has remained silent as calls for transparency mount.

Meanwhile, investors are reacting. Intel’s stock fell nearly 5% in premarket trading following Trump’s post, reflecting growing anxiety over potential leadership instability and the political issues surrounding the company. 

With Washington increasingly wary of Beijing’s influence in the tech supply chain, the timing of these revelations, whether substantiated or not, puts Intel in an uncomfortable spotlight.