Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers – Tech | Business | Economy https://techeconomy.ng Tech | Business | Economy Thu, 01 May 2025 15:28:04 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://techeconomy.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/cropped-256Px-32x32.png Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers – Tech | Business | Economy https://techeconomy.ng 32 32 Judge Says Apple Broke Court Order, Refers Company for Criminal Investigation https://techeconomy.ng/judge-says-apple-broke-court-order/ https://techeconomy.ng/judge-says-apple-broke-court-order/#respond Thu, 01 May 2025 15:28:04 +0000 https://techeconomy.ng/?p=157870 A federal judge in California has ruled that Apple deliberately defied a standing court order intended to open up competition in its App Store, leading to a criminal contempt referral to federal prosecutors.

The decision, handed down by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, follows years of court cases between Apple and Epic Games, the creators of Fortnite, over Apple’s grip on app distribution and in-app payment systems.

Judge Gonzalez Rogers stated that Apple ignored her 2021 injunction, which required the tech giant to allow app developers to direct users to alternative payment options outside Apple’s closed ecosystem.

Not only did Apple resist, it allegedly imposed new obstacles—like a 27% commission on off-app purchases—and deployed user warnings to deter alternative payment methods.

This is an injunction, not a negotiation. There are no do-overs once a party willfully disregards a court order,” the judge wrote.

Gonzalez Rogers has now referred Apple and its Vice President of Finance, Alex Roman, to the U.S. Department of Justice for possible criminal contempt proceedings. According to the judge, Roman’s testimony was “replete with misdirection and outright lies” about Apple’s compliance measures.

Internal court filings and documents also revealed that Apple CEO Tim Cook dismissed internal legal counsel urging the company to follow the injunction more faithfully.

From my point of view, this isn’t a story about fees or app design, but a challenge to the very core of Apple’s business model. 

For years, the company has insisted that its tight control over the App Store is essential for user safety and experience. But this ruling punches a hole in that history, revealing what appears to be a strategy built on minimising competition while maximising control.

Epic Games CEO, Tim Sweeney called the ruling “a significant win for developers and consumers.” Speaking to reporters, he added: “It forces Apple to compete with other payment services rather than blocking them, and this is what we wanted all along.”

Sweeney also said Epic plans to relaunch Fortnite on Apple’s platform as early as next week, following the game’s removal in 2020 for bypassing Apple’s payment system.

On the implications, Apple is now barred from applying its new 27% external transaction fee and from limiting how developers communicate with users about payment options.

The company, however, said: “We strongly disagree with the decision. We will comply with the court’s order and we will appeal.”

Judge Gonzalez Rogers said that’s no longer up to her. “It will be for the executive branch to decide whether Apple should be deprived of the fruits of its violation, in addition to any penalty geared to deter future misconduct,” she wrote.

]]>
https://techeconomy.ng/judge-says-apple-broke-court-order/feed/ 0
Google Agrees to $5 Billion Settlement in Secret Tracking Lawsuit https://techeconomy.ng/google-agrees-to-5-billion-settlement-in-secret-tracking-lawsuit/ https://techeconomy.ng/google-agrees-to-5-billion-settlement-in-secret-tracking-lawsuit/#respond Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:31:30 +0000 https://techeconomy.ng/?p=121536 Google has agreed to a $5 billion settlement in a lawsuit accusing the company of secretly tracking the internet use of millions of individuals who believed their browsing was private. 

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, postponed the scheduled Feb. 5, 2024 trial after Google and consumers’ lawyers reached a preliminary settlement. Although specific terms were not disclosed, both parties agreed to a binding term sheet through mediation, with plans to present a formal settlement for court approval by Feb. 24, 2024.

The lawsuit, filed in 2020, claimed that Google’s analytics, cookies, and apps allowed the company to track users’ activity even when using Chrome’s “Incognito” mode or other browsers’ “private” browsing mode. The plaintiffs argued that this turned Google into an “unaccountable trove of information,” exposing details about users’ friends, hobbies, favourite foods, shopping habits, and other personal online searches. 

In August, Judge Rogers rejected Google’s attempt to dismiss the lawsuit, emphasizing the uncertainty regarding Google’s binding promise not to collect data during private browsing, citing the company’s privacy policy and statements.

Covering millions of Google users since June 1, 2016, the lawsuit sought at least $5,000 in damages per user for alleged violations of federal wiretapping and California privacy laws. This settlement adds to Google’s recent legal challenges, including a $630 million payment to U.S. consumers over a Play Store app distribution dispute. 

In September, a tentative settlement was reached in a class-action lawsuit highlighting Google’s app distribution monopoly on Android through the Play Store. Moreover, in November 2022, Google initiated a pilot of its user choice billing program in the U.S., allowing developers to use alternative payment methods for in-app purchases.

]]>
https://techeconomy.ng/google-agrees-to-5-billion-settlement-in-secret-tracking-lawsuit/feed/ 0