ADVERTISEMENT
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
Tech | Business | Economy
No Result
View All Result
  • Technology
    • Trends
    • Telecoms
      • Broadband
    • ConsumerTech
      • Gadgets and Appliances
      • Apps
      • Accessories
      • Reviews
      • Unboxing
    • EnterpriseTECH
    • Security & Data Protection
    • How To
  • Business
    • Company News
    • StartUPs
      • Founder’s Story
      • Funding
    • Deals
    • People & Moves
    • SME & Entrepreneur Focus
    • BUSINESS SENSE FOR SMEs
    • Competition & Market Positioning
    • Commerce & Mobility
    • Travel
    • WomenPreneurs
  • Economy
    • Macroeconomic Trends
      • Macro Monday
      • TE Insights
    • Finance
      • Banks
      • Fintech
      • Insurance
      • Digital Assets
      • Personal Finance
    • Policies
      • Tech & Society
    • Market Analysis
    • Jobs & Workforce Economy
  • Features
    • Guest Writer
      • Chidiverse
      • Digital Assets
      • GameTech
    • EventDIARY
    • IndustryINFLUENCERS
    • MarkTECH
    • TBS
    • NewsEXTRA
  • Editorial
  • Brand Content
  • TECHECONOMY TV
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
Tech | Business | Economy
No Result
View All Result
Tech | Business | Economy
No Result
View All Result

Home » BBC Threatens Legal Action Against Perplexity Over Unauthorised Use of Its Content

BBC Threatens Legal Action Against Perplexity Over Unauthorised Use of Its Content

Joan Aimuengheuwa by Joan Aimuengheuwa
June 20, 2025
in EnterpriseTECH
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
BBC Threatens Legal Action Against Perplexity

Source: Getty Images

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has issued a legal threat to Perplexity, an AI-powered search startup, demanding that it cease using BBC content to train its AI models. 

In a letter addressed to Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, the BBC accused the company of scraping its online material without consent and warned of possible legal consequences if its demands were not met.

Specifically, the BBC is asking for the deletion of all copies of its content used for training purposes, an end to the practice, and a proposal for financial compensation. Failure to comply, it says, could lead to an injunction.

This escalation places Perplexity at the centre of a deepening rift between traditional media outlets and tech companies leveraging journalistic content to power artificial intelligence systems.

“The BBC’s letter outlines a potential injunction unless Perplexity halts its content scraping activities, purges existing data from its models, and presents a proposal for financial compensation,” reported Financial Times, which had access to the communication.

Perplexity’s reaction was quick as it said in a statement also quoted by FT, “The BBC’s claims are manipulative and opportunistic,” adding that the broadcaster “has a fundamental misunderstanding of technology, the internet and intellectual property law.”

This isn’t the first time Perplexity has drawn the ire of publishers. In October 2024, The New York Times served the company with a cease-and-desist notice over similar allegations. The paper demanded a full stop to the use of its articles in AI training and sought answers on how Perplexity bypassed anti-scraping mechanisms.

Other major publishers such as Forbes, Wired, and Axel Springer have had similar complaints. While Perplexity insists it is indexing publicly accessible content rather than scraping it for training, companies are not convinced.

To manage the case, Perplexity launched a Publishers Program in mid-2024, offering revenue-sharing arrangements to selected media outlets.

Among the early participants are TIME, Der Spiegel, The Texas Tribune, and Fortune. These partners receive a share of ad revenue whenever their content appears in responses generated by the platform.

We don’t know yet if the BBC was ever approached to join the scheme—or declined.

The broadcaster’s demand is a defensive legal move which stresses the need for a transparent and enforceable licensing structure for how AI firms use journalistic content.

Perplexity, which is backed by high-profile investors including Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, continues to defend its operations. The company maintains it is not infringing on intellectual property rights and blames the issue on misinterpretations of how its system works.

0Shares
Previous Post

Naira Holds in Official Market, Closes at N1,549/$1

Next Post

Meet the Top Investors Driving African Startup Funding

Joan Aimuengheuwa

Joan Aimuengheuwa

Joan thrives at helping individuals and businesses scale via storytelling...

Related Posts

AVEVA Day Nigeria

AVEVA Targets Nigeria as Africa’s Digital Transformation Hub, Plans University Partnerships, Local Talent Drive

June 15, 2026
digital trust African SMEs | AI | Nigerian companies| ecommerce in Nigeria | Kehinde Ogundare | Zoho Users | Zoho Nathu La server

Zoho Corporation Unveils Nathu La, a Designed-in-House Server, in a Move Towards Technological Sovereignty

June 12, 2026

Google Cuts AI Plus Subscription Price to $4.99 as Competition Heats Up

June 10, 2026
Load More
Next Post
Startups Funding and small businesses

Meet the Top Investors Driving African Startup Funding

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

TECHECONOMY YOUTUBE CHANNEL

  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 TECHECONOMY.

No Result
View All Result
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Features
  • Editorial
  • Brand Content
  • TECHECONOMY TV

© 2026 TECHECONOMY.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.