ADVERTISEMENT
Thursday, June 18, 2026
Tech | Business | Economy
No Result
View All Result
  • Technology
    • Trends
    • Telecoms
      • Broadband
    • ConsumerTech
      • Gadgets and Appliances
      • Apps
      • Accessories
      • Reviews
      • Unboxing
    • EnterpriseTECH
    • Security & Data Protection
    • How To
  • Business
    • Company News
    • StartUPs
      • Founder’s Story
      • Funding
    • Deals
    • People & Moves
    • SME & Entrepreneur Focus
    • BUSINESS SENSE FOR SMEs
    • Competition & Market Positioning
    • Commerce & Mobility
    • Travel
    • WomenPreneurs
  • Economy
    • Macroeconomic Trends
      • Macro Monday
      • TE Insights
    • Finance
      • Banks
      • Fintech
      • Insurance
      • Digital Assets
      • Personal Finance
    • Policies
      • Tech & Society
    • Market Analysis
    • Jobs & Workforce Economy
  • Features
    • Guest Writer
      • Chidiverse
      • Digital Assets
      • GameTech
    • EventDIARY
    • IndustryINFLUENCERS
    • MarkTECH
    • TBS
    • NewsEXTRA
  • Editorial
  • Brand Content
  • TECHECONOMY TV
Thursday, June 18, 2026
Tech | Business | Economy
No Result
View All Result
Tech | Business | Economy
No Result
View All Result

Home » Why Telco Innovation Doesn’t Require Rip-and-Replace

Why Telco Innovation Doesn’t Require Rip-and-Replace

| By: Warren Alberts, chief executive officer at VAS-X

Techeconomy by Techeconomy
May 28, 2026
in Guest Writer
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Telco innovation

Warren Alberts

For most telcos, business support systems are massive cost centres. This is, in large part, because a BSS is made up of various components that underpin virtually every customer-facing function, from billing and invoicing to collections, ticketing and CRM.

This complexity makes modernisation a daunting task and explains why telcos often hesitate to replace or overhaul these systems.

Not only is it costly and time-consuming to swap out your BSS but it’s also risky. A failed migration isn’t just an IT problem, it’s a potential business crisis, affecting service, revenue and reputation.

Within the average BSS, each module is tightly integrated with others so even a small change can have ripple effects across critical operations.

But sticking with a legacy BSS can quietly constrain a telco’s growth, agility, and customer experience. While these systems might be stable, a legacy BSS often works too rigidly, limiting the operator’s ability to evolve as quickly as the competition.

Launching new products and offers can take months instead of weeks because an older BSS is often heavily customised and thus more difficult to modify without extensive testing and downstream changes. Where modern systems are built for agility and immediacy, a legacy BSS can’t support real-time interactions and omnichannel journeys.

Let’s imagine an enterprise client wants to open a sponsored account for specific employees. A legacy BSS will struggle to set this up because these platforms weren’t designed to handle multi-party billing, real-time usage tracking, or flexible limits and notifications, which are essential for sponsored accounts. Similarly, setting up self-service offerings, which empower customers to manage their accounts, services, and issues independently, is possible but incredibly difficult with a legacy BSS.

Innovation in the front, legacy in the back

Given these realities, a common strategy sees operators upgrading the front end of a BSS while keeping the backend intact. This approach makes it possible to improve the user interface and the customer experience without disrupting core billing, service assurance, or revenue critical systems.

By modernising and updating the customer facing portal, operators can unlock new capabilities without making a massive change on the backend. And customers immediately benefit from a more modern, attractive experience.

This strategy also avoids the high cost and potential risks associated with a BSS ‘rip and replace’. By adopting a modular, phased approach to BSS modernisation, telos can introduce new functionality incrementally.

In addition, front-end modernisation often involves API layers that can connect legacy BSS to new services, digital ecosystems, or partner platforms. This opens up opportunities for new revenue streams and digital partnerships without backend disruption.

For CTOs and CIOs, the message is clear: modernising your BSS doesn’t mean you have to tear everything down and start over.

Legacy systems, while rigid and complex, provide the stability and reliability needed to keep revenue flowing and critical operations running.

By layering new technology on top of your existing BSS, you can introduce innovation safely, one step at a time.

This approach allows you to roll out new customer experiences, self-service capabilities, or sponsored account features without risking downtime or revenue leakage. In essence, you’re renovating rather than rebuilding: keeping the strong foundations that work while adding flexibility, agility, and modern functionality where it counts.

0Shares
MTN Live It 100 Thematic Campaign
Previous Post

Dollar to Naira Exchange Rate Today, May 28, 2026

Next Post

DE-CIX | OADC: Africa’s Newest Internet Hub to Bridge Connectivity Gap 

Techeconomy

Techeconomy

Related Posts

AI maturity mirage with Ayobami Aderemi

The AI Maturity Mirage: Are Design Teams Actually AI-Enabled, or Just AI-Adjacent?

June 9, 2026
dark data and AI Adoption | Shakeel Jhazbhay

Shedding Light on Dark Data; A Critical Step before AI Can Deliver Value

June 3, 2026

What Nigeria’s Floundering Anti-Terror Campaign Can Learn from Ukraine’s Robot War

June 2, 2026
Load More
Next Post
Africa's Newest Internet Hub to Bridge Connectivity Gap | DE-CIX

DE-CIX | OADC: Africa's Newest Internet Hub to Bridge Connectivity Gap 

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

TECHECONOMY YOUTUBE CHANNEL

  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 TECHECONOMY.

No Result
View All Result
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Features
  • Editorial
  • Brand Content
  • TECHECONOMY TV

© 2026 TECHECONOMY.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.