Justice Mojisola Dada of the Lagos Special Offences Court, Ikeja, has rejected a document presented by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in the ongoing trial of a former Managing Director of the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), Ahmed Kuru, and four others over allegations of defrauding Arik Air of N76 billion and $31.5 million.
Other defendants in the case include Mr. Kamilu Omokide, a former receiver manager of Arik Air Limited, Capt. Roy Ilegbodu, Arik Air’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Union Bank Limited, and Super Bravo Limited.
During the proceedings, the second prosecution witness, Mr. Augustine Obikwe, a retired Union Bank official, sought to tender a document he obtained from the EFCC.
However, the defense team objected to its admissibility, arguing that it was neither signed nor properly certified.
After hearing arguments from both sides, Justice Dada ruled that the witness was not part of the EFCC’s investigative team or an AMCON official, making him ineligible to tender the document.
Citing Section 104(1) of the Evidence Act, she held that only an officer with the original document had the authority to certify it.
“It is trite that the party must lay the foundation for any document sought to be tendered under the Evidence Act. Public documents must be certified by a public official,” the judge stated, rejecting the document.
Led in evidence by prosecution counsel Dr. Wahab Shittu (SAN), the witness, Mr. Obikwe, recounted his role in the financing of Arik Air’s aircraft procurement. He disclosed that he had worked in the United States from 1980 to 1982 before serving as the Group Executive Director of Corporate and International Banking at Union Bank.
He explained that Union Bank acted as a guarantor for Arik Air in securing funding for the acquisition of five aircraft—three Boeing 737-800 and two Airbus 340-500 planes—through export credit agencies, including US EXIM Bank, Coface of Germany, and the Export Credit Guarantee Department (ECGD) of the UK.
“Union Bank did not commit any money for the guarantee of the 85 percent. The three Boeing 737-800 were used for local operations, while the widebody aircraft were deployed to New York and London,” Obikwe testified.
He further noted that until his retirement from Union Bank in August 2009, Arik Air had never defaulted on its loan repayments.
During the hearing, the prosecution sought to tender a report from a meeting held by stakeholders in London. However, the defense team, led by Prof. Taiwo Osipitan (SAN) and Mr. Olalekan Ojo (SAN), objected on the grounds that the document was neither signed nor dated.
Ojo (SAN) argued that the document lacked authenticity, while Osipitan (SAN) questioned its origin, emphasizing that only original copies could be certified under the law.
Despite the objections, prosecution counsel Shittu (SAN) insisted on its relevance, stating, “Even if the document was stolen, in as much as it is relevant to the case, my lord, it is admissible in the law court.”
Justice Dada ruled in favor of the defense, maintaining that the document could not be admitted as evidence due to improper certification and the fact that the witness was not an EFCC investigative officer.
Following this ruling, the court adjourned the trial to May 19, 2025, for further proceedings.
